Public sector scenario 路 Registry cleanup

    Rely on operator data sourced directly fromauthoritative registries.

    Shell-company applicants exploit the gap between national registers, paper filings and the operating reality. The platform sources operator data from the same authoritative registries you do. but normalised across the EU-27 and continuously refreshed.

    Single Source of TruthEU-compliantFraud Prevention
    EU operator registry 路 normalised
    27 markets
    CountryOperatorSourceStatus
    DE

    Meyer Logistik GmbH

    Verified
    PL

    Transcargo Sp. z o.o.

    Verified
    IT

    Lombardia Express SRL

    Verified
    FR

    Lyon Fret SARL

    Verified
    ES

    Iberica Cargo SL

    Verified
    RO

    Bucure艧ti Trans SRL

    In review
    Each fact 路 source cited 路 signedprovenance default

    Use case

    Who this is for.

    For national and EU level transport public sector bodies combating fraud, this scenario helps discover shell companies and non compliant operators by surfacing cross border inconsistencies.

    Customer problems

    What does not work today.

    • 1

      Shell companies file paper applications in one market and operate in another, escaping easy detection.

    • 2

      National registers don't talk to each other; the same shell looks clean in 26 countries.

    • 3

      Manual cross-checks are slow and easy to game.

    Solution

    What we do instead.

    • Operator data is sourced from each country's authoritative registry, normalised and continuously refreshed.

    • Beneficial-owner and address-mismatch signals surface across borders, not just per country.

    • Every fact carries its source citation. provenance is the default, not an afterthought.

    Ease of use

    You integrate via an API, a single call reveals the status of any operator, normalised across 27 countries. You do not need to rewrite your forms or processes to begin.

    Illustrative metrics

    Modeled ranges from the field.

    These are illustrative. Your numbers will depend on your starting baseline and policies.

    01
    Same shift
    fraud signal deployment
    02
    EU 27
    countries verified
    03
    0
    operator data stale points

    Objections

    Honest answers.

    We already share data with other public sector bodies, what is the difference here?

    Existing data sharing is often bilateral and manual. Trusted Carrier unifies official registry data from all 27 EU member states, normalising it into a single view for real time verification.

    Our current systems are sufficient for identifying problem operators.

    Traditional systems struggle with cross border inconsistencies and real time updates. Trusted Carrier exposes these issues by continuously sourcing and verifying data from official registries across the EU 27.

    FAQ

    Three answers.

    Does this overlap with national operator registers?+

    It complements them. the platform sources from those same registers and exposes a normalised view across the EU-27.

    What about data sovereignty?+

    Fully GDPR-compliant with European hosting; public sector bodies see only data the operator has lawfully exposed to the verification network.

    Can we plug it into existing enforcement systems?+

    Yes. REST API and signed exports are the standard integration paths.

    Verified once. Trusted everywhere.

    I want toRely on operator data sourced directly from authoritative registries.